Test Automation on CentOS CI with Ansible

I work on Gluster, which is a distributed file system. Testing a distributed file system needs a distributed setup. We run regressions by faking a distributed setup. We’re planning on using Glusto for real distributed functional testing. Centos CI gives us on-demand physical hardware to run tests. I’ve been working on defining our jobs on Centos CI with Jenkins Job Builder.

In the past, we created our jobs via the UI and committed the XML to a git repo. This version control is dependent on discipline from the person making the change. The system is not built around discipline. This does not scale well. Every person who wants to add a test needs to have access or work with someone who does have access to add a new job.

Manufacturing Line

With Jenkins Job Builder, the configuration is the single source of truth for any given job. As a bonus, this reduces code duplication. With David’s help, I wrote centos-ci-sample, which establishes a better pattern for Centos CI jobs. David pointed me to the post-task publisher, which makes sure that the nodes are returned to the pool even on a failing job. This sample is good, but worked best for jobs that needed just one node.

We’re starting to setup proper multi-node tests for functional tests with Glusto. I decided to use an Ansible playbook for the setup of the nodes. Our internal QE folks will be re-using this playbook for setup.

Converting a Jenkins XML to JJB YAMl is fun. It’s best to look at the UI and read the XML to get an idea of what the job does. Then write a YAML which does something close to that. Once you have a YAML, it’s best to convert it to XML and do a diff against the existing job. I use xmllint -c14n to make both XML files standardized. Then I use colordiff to compare the diff. This gives me an idea of what I’ve added/removed. There will always be some changes. JJB assumes some sane defaults.

Image credit: aldenjewell 1951 Plymouth Assembly Line (license)



, ,




Leave a Reply